Mike Gathers (from the Hilaritas Press website) |
Lord of Light: Editor's Note
(Theory)
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
We’ll need to go back almost half-a-century to begin at the beginning: when Wilson sent a transcript for “Do What Thou Wilt,” the centerpiece and impetus of the volume at hand, to the publisher-of-the-weird Herbert Roseman. Or perhaps we should go back sixty-one years to Wilson and Roseman’s time working together in Yellow Springs, OH. If we wish to expand the scope of our vision, exchanging focus for greater accuracy, we can go back to Wilson’s birth in Flatbush ninety-one years ago. Or we can go back 147 years, 10 months and 23 days ago to the birth of Edward Alexander Crowley, the future (or, 119 years past from our perspective) Prophet of the New Aeon. That’s a small sample of how Crowley would have us think, if we are to take him at his occasional word. Crowley repeatedly stated that one of the myriad benefits of the practice of keeping a magical diary was the cultivation of the magical memory, or the ability to “remember, backwards.” Crowley encouraged students to make the first entry of their journal an autobiographical account of how they ended up in the here and now of beginning to keep a magical diary. With typical Crowleyean exactitude, he allows this task to become improbably difficult. He was not much of a man for short cuts when he believed something was worth doing; nor at times when one suspects he didn’t have or understand his motivations behind an undertaking. “No slacking please,” indeed. “Go back to the beginning” seems like a simple enough task, but like James’ turtles or Aquinas’ causes, we quickly learn that trying to trace anything back to the beginning can take an eternity. So the student is forced to focus on the particulars, even if they’ve made their best concerted attempt at their journal’s autobiographical frontispiece, because we aren’t given enough time to complete it. One cannot drain the ocean in three draughts, magic is afoot and calls for experimentation of exploration. To begin at the beginning, we must put one foot forward and hope that we can properly cover the foundations at some future junction twixt past and present. But one does one’s best and Mike Gathers provides a comprehensive account of the particular history of the Hilaritas Press original publication, Lion of Light: Robert Anton Wilson On Aleister Crowley. Being Mike Gathers, a veteran and expert archivist of Wilson’s astoundingly proliferative corpus, he does an excellent job of doing this: therefore, I won’t recount too much of the history here, as it would be extraneous. Simply read the “Editor’s Note” and our Editor will give you all the information you need on the history of the pieces contained herein and the process that went into making this book physically extant. It seems like a great work in and of itself that required fortuitous circumstance(s), years long vigilance and enthusiasm for the work of Aleister Crowley and Robert Anton Wilson, as well as old fashioned hard work on the behalf of various parties who make up a large part of Wilson’s living legacy. Gathers included a facsimile of the cover letter for “Do What Thou Wilt” in his “Note” and quotes from it where Wilson writes about a longer, forthcoming “long book” on Crowley, Lion of Light. Mike also notes that some other forthcoming books mentioned in the letter never came to pass in the form that Wilson described in November 1974. Out of the seven working titles in his letter, only one came to pass in the manner that Wilson expected at the time; which is to say that this isn’t the Lion of Light that Wilson occasionally mentioned working on during that period of his life. But whether there is an unpublished manuscript for the longer work out there somewhere, Mike notes that the title was simply “too good to pass up.” So, whether Lion of Light might have been different in the universe next door; this is our universe’s reconstruction of the book that could have been, composed by its experts. Gathers makes sure to note the efforts of Oz and Chad Nelson towards producing the collection that is our Lion of Light, along with input provided by Michael Johnson, Rasa and himself during the coagula process. I was so impressed by what I was able to see of the inner workings of the conversation, as well as the assiduous copyediting efforts of Iain Spence, that I penned a brief post on Tom Jackson’s RAWIllumination. Mike also made sure to note the copyediting work on the behalf of Eric Wagner in a comment for that post. (Not that the post is particularly important, especially in light of the heft Gathers’ “Note,” but I was struck enough that I felt I would be remiss not to add another testimony to the work behind this fantastic recreation.) Furthermore, Gathers gives a cohesive account of how “Do What Thou Wilt” was rediscovered thanks to the always attentive Tom Jackson, Martin Wagner and Jesse Walker. In John Higgs’ The Future Starts Here, he closes the book by discussing Daisy Eris Campbell’s mycelium metaphor, which compares nicely to Brian Eno’s concept of “scenius.” The oversimplified version of either conceit is that great works of art, scholarship or progress are due to networks of people, not individuals; thus it is with Lion of Light. This book was the result of a group of people united by their passion for Robert Anton Wilson and, somewhat less, the work of Aleister Crowley. Under the aegis of Hilaritas Press, these threads were brought together to produce something valuable for our scholarship, entertainment and further illumination. So it will go with this reading group, if we are lucky; as a group of voices, we will be able to explicate and shed some light upon various parts of Lion of Light, increasing our knowledge and enriching our conversation so that we can take as much from the work as we may at this time. I’m looking forward to the process and am overjoyed I have seen the resurrection of what might have been lost to the haze of time otherwise. After giving thanks to those that allowed this to come to pass, let us seize this moment and experience the transformative possibilities of such a potent collection of texts, together. Next week, we’ll discuss Lon Milo Duquette’s “Few Words of Introduction” and Richard Kaczynski’s “Forward” before diving into Wilson’s works. I should also note that new posts will be going up on Sundays from here on.
(Practice)
In last week's post I recommended that readers take up the practice of reciting the prayers in Crowley's Liber Resh or, the Four Adorations. I've personally noted that there's some more fire in my adorations this past week, even with the flimsiest prospect of doing them along with a few other people scattered across the globe during this particular moment. I can only reiterate my encouragement to do this and see what might happen.
Love in the law, love under will.
As it happens, I finally finished Richard Kaczynski's Crowley biography "Perdurabo" tonight, the same night as your first posting for the new reading group. I was going to read "Lion of Light" next anyway, but now I think it will do it on a pace to match this reading group.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed Mike Gathers' "Editor's Note." I particularly liked the way he studied the index of "Cosmic Trigger" to note who had the most references. I will note, if I may, that the URL for my blog is RAWIllumination.net, not RAWIllumination.com.
I gather that you are instructing everyone to simulataneously work on magick as theory AND practice as we advance through the book?
I did like the Cosmic Trigger detail as well. My supposition that Wilson was fonder of Crowley than the other luminaries he draws upon kicked up quite a bit of discussion behind the scenes.
ReplyDeleteWhile I'm not instructing anyone to do anything, I am suggesting that following the practices will at least make for a richer experience going through the book.
The SubGenius must have Slack!
ReplyDeleteI am very happy to know that you enjoyed Graham Bond, sharing good music makes me feel like I am keeping it alive and going, in a sense.
ReplyDeleteI love the mycelium as a metaphor, and can only applaud the dedication of the British Isles Discordians to make it a reality. Strength through decentralization, everyone receiving, interpreting, and transmitting information with the prism of their own individuality, in a constant feedback loop between all parts. As such, I find it interesting to put the mycelium in perspective with concepts like Indra’s Net, or a highly functioning neural network. Of course, the mycelium is also a rhizome, so Oz Fritz probably could bridge in Deleuze here.
The ‘remembering, backwards’ calls to mind the ‘right where you are sitting now’ exercize, which in turn reminds me of the fantastic docu mini-series Connections by James Burke. James makes use of what could surely be termed magickal memory to pretty much transmute linear History into a mycelium of interconnected events. Highly recommended, and all three seasons are available at the Internet Archive:
https://archive.org/details/ConnectionsByJamesBurke
It looks to me like the facsimile of RAW’s letter does contain a few typos, perhaps ironically since he is talking of the many typos on the copy done by his student.
I like a lot the blending of RAW’s spiral, which has become the Hilaritas Press logo, with Crowley’s Unicursal Hexagram. The hexagram stands for the macrocosm, and the flower of five petals in its center symbolizes the microcosm of WoMan. Brought together they traditionally represent the Great Work accomplished. Maybe coupling it with the ever upward-going spiral can be seen as a reminder that, in fact, the work is never over (as the secret chiefs of Daft Punk once hinted at).
That being said, I concur with Eric Wagner that Slack might be necessary, if only for an hour at a time. At least as a Discordian, I feel the need to balance eristic and aneristic principles. I would argue that, as incredibly hard working as they were, both Crowley and Bob Wilson did the same.
I have been doing my best to integrate Liber Resh in my daily routine. It brings to mind this song:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqbW6egV-24
Apuleius, thanks for mentioning the small group that synergestically assembled Lion of Light. At the first workshop I attended at The Institute for the Development of the Harmonious Human Being (I.D.H.H.B.) with E.J. Gold in 1990, much emphasis got placed on the value of working in small groups. The I.D.H.H.B. annual Labor Day convention followed with 3 - 400 people attending which Gold kind of blew up saying it would be the last one there and that if folks wanted a convention, they could have smaller regional ones elsewhere, not in his backyard, so to speak. When I got back to NY, I attended a lecture with Timothy Leary that seemed a bit of a deja vu because he also emphasized that value of working in small groups. Afterwards, I hung out backstage with a few others and found the chance to ask Leary how I could get a job like his. He gave me a quizzical look, so I said, "you know, like being a 'cheerleader for change' (a slogan of his I'd read). At first he said that he didn't know but if I found out to please tell him. Then he asked me if I had a computer.
ReplyDeleteSpookah, I didn't realize mycelia classified as a rhizome, but that makes perfect sense, Speaking of which, Deleuze begins Logic of Sense talking about pure events using the pure event of Alice growing larger or smaller in her Wonderland Adventures. Of course, in the story, this pure event comes as a result of her eating a piece of mushroom though Deleuze doesn't mention that.
Tom, as one of the Lion of Light proofreaders, please accept my apology for missing the typo in the suffix of your blog.
Well, I am no biologist and might have wanted to avoid using 'is' in my phrasing. But there seem to be overlap between the two concepts, and we talk for instance of mycorrhiza:
ReplyDeletehttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycorrhiza
Hey Oz, don't worry about it! Typos happen!
ReplyDeleteI was mostly quoting Donovan with the "no slacking, please" line, but I am afraid that the Great Work and magic doesn't tend to let you ever feel completely rested. There's always more to do.
ReplyDeleteContrariwise, this is the Utopian Oath- a bit of fiction I draw strength from in my daily life:
"I hereby renounce the right to complacency, and vow lifelong to take only what minimum of leisure is necessary to my productivity, viewing health, happiness, rest and play as means, not ends, and that, while Utopia provides my needs, I will commit the fully produce of my labors to our collective effort to redirect the path of human life away from death and toward the stars."
Sounds severe, but the "minimum of leisure" is open to interpretation. Of course, I don't think there's anything wrong with slacking on your job, unpleasant but necessary relationships, taxes (barring the rich and corporations- fuck them) or societal expectations, as long as you can get away with it.
@Spookah, I don't listen to much modern bands, but I have always enjoyed the Brian Jonestown Massacre. Thanks for the recommendation! Graham Bond is quickly becoming a favorite in our household. Since I taught my daughter the Lesser Ritual years ago, I think she's finding it decently groovy.
Testing. Quack, quack, quack!
ReplyDeleteOnce we selected the .6-7 essays and assembled them with the newly written supplemental material, this project became a series of iterations of formatting and mostly proof reading. We had Oz, Chad, myself, Rasa, Wagner, Spense and Johnson all thoroughly scrutinizing this monster electronic file and we are still catching little things very now and then.
ReplyDelete