Lion of Light: The Hidden Heritage – Foreword to Charles Kipp’s Astrology, Aleister & Aeon p. 195 - 213
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law
“. . . Crowley remains a mystery inside a puzzle within a controversy cloaked in uncertainty.” After 28 years of research and experimentation into the Man, the Myth, and his Magick, Wilson provides this open-ended, bottomless, agnostic description of the subject he’s considered an expert on. His expertise on Herr 666 must explain why he nabbed this assignment. Kipp’s book uses Aleister as a focal point to write about Astrology, or so says the description on Amazon, I have not read the book myself. If anyone reading this has, what do you think of it? It seems a little surprising to find Wilson writing a Foreword to a book on Astrology given that he didn’t care for it. We find only the slightest of allusions to the subject in a quote from Crowley’s Gnostic Catholic Mass: “I believe in one Star in the company of Stars of whose fire we are created, and to which we shall return; and in one Father of Life, Mystery of Mystery, in his name CHAOS” appearing at the very beginning and again at the end to nicely frame the piece. You won’t find one word about the book this is a Foreword to.
I have only a superficial understanding of Astrology, maybe because I came up through the Wilson school of magick which didn’t direct much attention to that area. My father, the physicist, showed interest in it; unfortunately I didn’t get the opportunity to discuss it with him. I discovered it only after he left his mortal coil. He had a number of books on Astrology that I inherited including some basic texts on how to go about understanding and applying it. I took a crack at learning Astrology through these to no avail. However, I do think there’s something to it. I have friends I respect who are experts in the field. I also consider the astrological portent about timing certain events through drawing Tarot cards. Each of the Trumps, except The Fool, The Hanged Man, and The Aeon correspond to an astrological figure. Those three correspond to the elements Air, Water and Fire. The Universe card does double duty corresponding to Saturn and Earth (the element). Each of the small cards of the Minor Arcana represents one decan (10 degrees or 10 days of the zodiac belt.) The astrological aspects of the Tarot gets explained very well in Duquette’s Understanding Aleister Crowley’s Thoth Tarot.
Uncle Al did know astrology inside and out. It’s well known that he was a ghost writer for Evangeline Adams, a very popular New York based astrologer. He wrote two best-sellers for her: Astrology: Your Place in the Sun and Astrology: Your Place Among the Stars both of which came out under Adams’ moniker with no mention of Crowley. He finally received credit with the 2002 publication of The General Principals of Astrology, Liber 536 that included his material originally written for Adams. It also includes the birth charts, with ample explanation, for 193 famous people including luminaries such as Shakespeare, Dante, Mark Twain, Winston Churchill and Napoleon. In Confessions, Crowley claimed the ability to guess the rising sign at a person’s birth based on their appearance. Naturally, he kept track of his guesses and found he was right two out of three times. Anecdotal evidence in one of his biographies backs this up.
Wilson sets the stage, the mise en scene for Astrology, Aleister & Aeon in “The Hidden Heritage” by constructing a concise history of Hermetic secret societies and their place in the world starting with Freemasonry, moving to the Rosicrucians, and the Illuminati, then leading to the Golden Dawn, the O.T.O. and finally, Crowley. He sees Golden Dawn elements in the literature of Pound, Eliot and Joyce. I saw some in Proust who was related, through marriage, to Macgregor Mathers. It’s a brilliant and very informative history of these groups and how popular opinion reacted and responded to them.
RAW’s foreword has some excellent literary tricks/easter eggs; two that I know of. Wilson on Crowley:
“’Thank God I’m an atheist,’ he once wrote piously and that’s not anywhere near the peaks of paradox he employed to both reveal and conceal the meanings of his very hermetic books.”
The essay has other paradox or paradox-like tropes starting with the opening quote: “ I believe. . . (famously, he has said, “I don’t believe in anything”).The piece starts by ranking Crowley against a backdrop of the 20th Century’s worst thugs then turns around and compares him to brilliant people while throwing in Kennedy and Bill Clinton for comic relief. He first section, Something Wicked This Way Comes named from a Ray Bradbury story, also an excellent film. That’s followed by the next section, Light in Extension.
The s +c letter code I may have mentioned once or twice previously in my uncollected works gets a little nod here. Apart from Wilson, this code gets employed by Rabelais, Aleister Crowley, James Joyce, Robert Heinlein, Gilles Deleuze and Thomas Pynchon that I know of. Pynchon explicitly identifies this code as a code in his Introduction to Slow Learner. In “The Hidden Heritage,” I first noticed it on page 199 as part of the light bulb changing riddle: “That’s a Craft secret.” Then, in the footnote on p. 201 “Copernican system of astrology.” Next, at the top of p. 208: “. . . revealed the secret clearly;” and at the bottom: “’support and congratulations.’” In the penultimate paragraph Wilson repeats a phrase he used earlier about a mystery inside a puzzle . . . then adds a different ending: “ . . . and yet still strangely concealed . . .” Some of these may have been coincidences, who knows? But then we see the word CHAOS (caps in the original) ending the opening quote as well as the last word in the piece, which starts with a C and ends with a S. The first sentence in Ulysses begins with an S; the last word in that long” sentence begins with a C. We find Wilson doing the same with the first section header. He was known to sometimes model his writing after Joyce. If this seems far-fetched, precedent for this kind of letter encoding and more gets identified in Tindall’s Guide to Finnegans Wake and Campbell and Robinson’s Skeleton Key… with the letters HCE and ALP.
The mystery of the lost “word” of the Freemasons comes under discussion, with the suggestion, based on Egyptian mythology, that this “word” = entheogen drugs. Support for this view comes from chapter 72 in Confessions where Crowley claims that he knows this lost word, without revealing it. Wilson deduces that he means these kinds of drugs because Crowley majored in organic chemistry and he offered them to the audience at his Rites of Eleusis performance series. True to form, RAW then offers an alternate model – tantric sex as the lost word. An informative lecture covering Crowley on drugs is presented by Richard Kaczynski here:
The part about his drug experimentation begins around 15:30 and concludes around 57:00.
On p. 203, Wilson says: “Bernard Shaw’s Back to Methuselah owes much to syncretic Golden Dawn ideas he probably learned from Florence Farr . . .”
Florence Farr was an actress, active feminist and an adept in the Golden Dawn. In “The Hidden Heritage” RAW claims that she was also the mistress of Shaw, Yeats, and Crowley. I haven’t been able to verify her romance with Crowley. The all-wise internet only says there was much speculation about it and that Crowley was certainly enamored of Farr, basing the character of Sister Cybele in his novel Moonchild on her. Farr was said to be present at Crowley’s initiation into the Golden Dawn, but she was also one of his superiors in the Order who refused his 5°=6° Adeptus Minor initiation siding with Yeats against Mathers and Crowley in the famous schism that eventually broke up the original Golden Dawn.
Back to Methuselah is an epic play, it can run up to 6 – 7 hours, yet it did have performances on Broadway and other prominent theatrical venues. In 1982 at New York’s Joyce Theater, I saw the Living Theater’s production of The Yellow Methuselah based on Shaw’s play and Kandinsky’s The Yellow Sound and it blew my mind. The setting of it ranged from the Garden of Eden to several thousand years in the future. The Living Theater was known for breaking down the fourth wall and inviting audience participation. I remember cast members costumed like sprites running though the audience whispering to us, “in the future, all is poetry” like a mantra. Shortly before the intermission, this surrealistic offering convened a panel on stage consisting of characters of famous people, including Bernard Shaw, discussing a now, alas, forgotten philosophical question. After the panel gave their responses, it was decided to ask the audience in the front two rows. A mic was passed around and people gave their opinions. After the 15 minute intermission, they came back with an answer to this question which consisted of playing back an edited tape recording of the audience’s answers. I was impressed with the speed they had put it together, long before computer digital editing; done on the fly, the old-fashioned way, with tape and a razor blade.
The word “syncretic” quite accurately used to describe the Golden Dawn in the above quote also seems a profitable approach to personal voluntary evolution: use what works for you from any system, religion, mythology, work of literature, piece of music, etc. and discard or pass by what you don’t need. Model Agnosticism lends itself to a syncretic strategy for Initiation.
Another sentence beginning at the bottom of p. 202 stood out for me. Included in the description of the Golden Dawn we find: “This was combined with a profound study of Christian Cabala, a derivative of the original Jewish Cabala, a science or art influencing occult society which provides a religious language and numerology to discuss and clarify various altered states of consciousness.” (I’ve corrected the typo that occurs in the text – “influential” should read “influencing.”) Many people don’t bother to tackle Cabala as learning it feels like a monumental and daunting task. I will share how a very lazy person, myself, Picked it up a little at a time.
1. Procure a copy of 777 and Other Qabalistic Writings of Aleister Crowley.
2. Write down all the correspondences for key 6, Tiphareth. Pay attention when you encounter one of these correspondences as you go about daily life. For instance, seeing a Buddha statue, a Calvary Cross, a rose, a lion (if you happen to live in Africa or are at the zoo) or a see a book with “lion” in the title (very rare, I know) or even hear a song about a lion like “The Lion Sleeps Tonight,” anything that strikes you as particularly beautiful, etc, etc. etc. I combined this with an exercise to invoke/make contact with a deity connected to Tiphareth. For that, I worked with “Liber Asarté vel Berylli” found in the Appendix of Magick, Book Four which I modified to comport with my situation.
3. Procure a poster or a large photo of the Qabalistic Tree of Life. Put it somewhere where it’s comfortable to absent-mindedly gaze at, see and ponder. I used the cover illustration to Dion Fortune’s The Mystical Qabalah pictured below. Posters of this were still available when I looked for one for a student a few years ago. Eventually, you will want to read something that outlines and explains the Sephira (spheres) and the paths that connect them. Fortune’s book provides an excellent study and there are others. In the course of this you will pick up the Hebrew alphabet, each letter corresponds with a path on the Tree. The first time I saw a diagram of the Tree of Life was on the back of a Todd Rundgren concert t-shirt. It had “Healing” on the front which was the name of the tour and his new album at the time. I saw it 2 or 3 days following the Living Theater performance mentioned above. Working with Tarot cards is another painless way to absorb Cabala.
4. Read the fiction of Robert Anton Wilson beginning with Illuminatus! Read Cosmic Trigger I.
5. If any particular number recurs frequently and/or you experience a strong synchronicity with a number, look it up. Apply your intuition (which becomes stronger with use) to decipher what, if any, meaning it has for you.
6. Learn to transpose words to numbers then look up the number in “Sepher Sephiroth” (back of 777.) There is a chart there to transpose English and Hebrew letters to numbers. All the English letters are there except: F which I usually connect with Vau (6) because they’re both the sixth letter of their respective alphabets. Traditional Hebrew corresponds F with Peh (80). You can do it however it makes sense to you. I also ascribe “W” to Vau. The letter V is also there with Vau though traditional Hebrew has a variation connecting it with Peh. The letter X is missing from the chart, I put it with Tzaddi (90).
Also useful – “The Meaning of the Primes from 11 to 97” list on page xxv. Look up 23, for instance, if you happen to break out in a rash of coincidences with that prime (also very rare, I know). It gives the meaning: “The glyph of life – nascent life.” Perhaps this can indicate spiritual life or, as Timothy Leary prefers, extra-terrestrial life?
Contrary to Crowley’s instructions, I’ve never memorized any of the Qabalistic tables. Some things naturally become memorized through frequent use. As indicated above, Wilson says much of modern literary culture owes its symbolism and themes to the Golden Dawn and cites Yeats’ poetry, Ezra Pound, Eliot and Joyce as examples. I would add Thomas Pynchon. Learning Cabala will aid one’s understanding and appreciation of this literature.
Love is the law, love under will.
Oz
I have to admit that Crowley just doesn’t do a thing for me. I took another crack at 8 Lectures on Yoga recently and I found his take on yoga rather limited by his lens of magical practice. He also strikes me as a bit of smarty pants in the worst way. A great teacher simplifies and makes the material accessible. A smarty pants cloaks their message with intellectual baggage in a vain show of their superiority. (The movie Waking Life, for example, is almost 100% intellectual baggage IMO). He strikes me as an absolute shit teacher and it's no wonder there's book upon book trying to explain WTF he's all about.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, I guess I’m put my grand opinion out there on the whole thing. Regardie nailed it. Crowley spiritual progress stopped at the failure in Call of the 10th Aether. I get that he later came up with the sex-magick think, and I’m still only half convinced of the magick in sex magick – meaning I think he just liked to fuck and that was half the equation. And yes, we have the book of Thoth. But really, that’s about it. Reading Purdurabo, I found most of his post-American existence to be… rather pathetic, and really the only thing that made his America years not pathetic is that he was not-broke somehow. But I digress.
In the call of the 10th, it was Neuburg that was initiated. Crowley was just a vehicle for the initiation. He identified with Choronzon while Neuberg related to it. I’ll say that again – Crowley identified with Choronzon. Neuberg dealt with Choronzon directly through relationship. Now that’s a deep topic to unpack in a blog comment, and I'll just leave it at that.
Thank-you for your opinion. Crowley isn't for everyone. Have you tried any of the practices?
DeleteI agree with some of what you said; I do think Crowley was sometimes a pathetic figure and his own worst enemy. He failed many people as a personal teacher and his writing is full of a type of humor that gets in the way over and over again.
DeleteFor me, most of Regardie's writings are much better for learning purposes (especially at the beginning), but others have told me they find them fairly dull especially when compared with AC's work. I do see what they mean.
I don't agree that Regardie nailed it in his Crowley bio. The book has a lot of good stuff in it, but I dislike the conclusion and I frequently find the opinions reductive.
Regarding a Crowley practice to try: a fav of mine that doesn't get mentioned nearly enough are the 3 practices in Liber HHH, especially the last.
Gathers, your comment strikes me as an amusing put on, the kind of emotionally charged, uninformed, inaccurate nonsense, one finds in an opinionated Facebook rant that has little to do with the subject at hand. But maybe you're sincere in your condemnation? The title of this post = "Cloaked in Uncertainty."
DeleteBoth Regardie and Wilson considered Crowley an exceptional teacher as evident by what has been presented in Lion of Light if you've been paying attention.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteLvx15, I agree, Liber HHH is an excellent set of exercises. The middle one, A.A.A. adapts well to working with in a floatation tank. It's also an excellent club to join for their invaluable help with roadside assistance when your car breaks down and is in need of a tow.
DeleteI enjoy Crowley's humor. If it gets in the way, it does so in a positive fashion that challenges the reader or student to think for themselves. Gilles Deleuze considers humor a significant contributing factor in the production of sense. If Crowley was humorless or had the "right" kind of humor, Wilson may not have been attracted to his writings.
Mike Gathers, lot of Crowley appears very accessible, in particular his fundamental practices. Book 1 of Magick reads very clearly as do the theorems which outline his theory of Magick in Book 3 Magick in Theory and Practice. Magick Without Tears, Crowley's letters to a beginning student, appears easy to follow, as was intended. Sometimes, he appears difficult to understand. In my opinion, a great teacher will present obstacles, challenges and problems for the student to overcome. A really great teacher, like Crowley, will create a maze or a labyrinth, puzzles for the student to solve hopefully resulting in growth and self-reliance. I also put Gurdjieff, Deleuze, Joyce, Wilson and E.J. Gold in that category of teacher. I was surprised to find out recently that some literary "experts" consider Finnegans Wake unreadable. This judgement seems based on laziness and ignorance. Judgements like that say more about the person making the statement than what they condemn with the judgement.
Having read thousands of pages of Crowley and thousands more about him, I guess I could say I enjoy his humor too (mostly, when it isn't unnecessarily cruel). But there are few people in my life that I'd suggest read him. I used to try; Eight Lectures on Yoga (which I prize) being one of my first recommendations. It doesn't go over well. All my Crowley friends are internet friends nowadays. I'm thankful y'all exist!
DeleteI have practiced all of HHH at Nashville Float.😁
Eight Lectures on Yoga was recommended by the Sivananda Yoga Center in New York and was part of their library when I lived there in 1984. It's a pretty traditional yoga school and that was the only Crowley title they were into, but they did tolerate my interest and practice of Magick. They were ok with anything as long as it didn't involve sex, drugs, alcohol, loud music and eating meat on their premises.
DeleteBradbury got the line "Something wicked this way comes" from "Macbeth".
ReplyDeleteI didn't know that, thank-you.
DeleteThank you very much Oz Fritz for yet another very informative post, and for your practical recommendations at the end.
ReplyDeleteI would be curious to know what the people around here think of the traditional admonition not to study Qabalah before age 40. A similar age is recommended by Jung for undertaking the process of individuation through attempts at stirring up the unconscious, and I suspect that in both case it has something to do with having already established a strong basis in one’s life.
Crowley did not wait to be 40, but it seems that RAW kind of did, although it could just have been a coincidence that he got interested in this stuff around that age, magick finding him at the right time.
I know very little about astrology, but feel compelled to learn more about it. Astrology, like alchemy, seems important in gaining better understanding of the Tarot, especially the decks coming from the Golden Dawn tradition such as the Rider-Waite or the Thoth. I have on top of my to-read pile a Richard Tarnas book called Cosmos and Psyche, and plan on getting to it very soon. From this, I hope to learn more about the way ancient civilizations were thinking about the stars.
I very much enjoyed discovering that “the Irish Gaelic name for this fabulous fungus [psilocybin-containing mushrooms] is Pookeen” (p.211), semantically connecting shrooms and the Pookah.
I was wondering if anyone here know of, and would recommend, a good book on the history of freemasonry? RAW mentions a few in this piece, and typically books on the subject seem easy to find in bookshops, but I feel doubtful regarding the quality of scholarship in many of these.
In this chapter of Lion of Light, I also found a few typos.
- “Hold onto to your hats” (p.197) I guess should read ‘hold on to your hats’.
- In the note about Giordano Bruno on page 201, there is mention of “historian Francis Yates”. Yates was a woman and her correct name was Frances.
- On page 207 we find “his/her/self”. According to the context, I think this should read him/her -self, or perhaps his/her Self.
- Finally page 212 sees mention of French publishing company “J’ai Lui”, which should be J’ai Lu, meaning ‘I have read’ (j’ai lui means ‘I have him’). They do paperbacks, and probably are in the top three most successful and commonly found brand in this domain, kind of like Penguin for the English language.
Finally, I would say that, for me, Crowley does not appear the best place to start if one is totally new to magick. Robert Anton Wilson, Lon Milo Duquette or Israel Regardie seem like better entry points. But eventually, getting to Uncle Al seems like the logical next step, and there seem to be enough material to study for a lifetime or two. In fact, even leaving magick aside, the sheer amount of knowledge that transpires from Aleister’s writings I find breathtaking. That was something that impressed me, and got me curious, back when I discovered RAW, and the same can be said of AC. Just following Crowley’s list of recommended reading, and skipping over the more esoteric stuff if that isn’t your thing, you would end up having a strong basis in philosophy and comparative religion, not to mention probably a deeper understanding of Bob Wilson.
Thanks for reading my post, Spookah. I wish you had been part of our proof reading team. I'm keeping a file of all these corrections and will send them to Hilaritas after we finish.
ReplyDeleteCrowley didn't care much for traditional Kabbalah and some traditionalists I've read don't think highly of his Qabalah. I think RAW would have been 36 - 38 when he started writing Illuminatus! which has a lot of Cabala in it. He started reading Joyce in his twenties or earlier if I remember correctly and JJ includes a fair amount of it in his later writings. I don't know when RAW actually learned it. With his rapid grasp of Crowley after first diving in to him in 1970 (age 38) I suspect he already had some familiarity with it. I was 24 when I started learning Qabalah via the method outlined above. So far, I've only metaphorically been struck by lightening.
The Key to Solomon's Key by Duquette covers the subject and esoteric theories of Freemasonry along with the Knights Templar and Goetic magic and is an enjoyable and informative read but is not an extensive history of Freemasonry. One of these days I'll crack open Waite's book on Freemasonry which I've had for years.
Mike, I love Waking Life. I see it as a more thematically-focused variation of Linklater's 1990 film Slacker, which I also like. Because it can feel pretty dense, the film lends itself well to multiple viewings. I also enjoyed the rotoscopic animation, which Linklater used in his PK Dick adaptation of A Scanner Darkly as well.
ReplyDeleteSince floatation tanks have been mentioned, I'd like to share my cinematic discovery of the week, the little-remembered 1963 film The Mind Benders, starring Dirk Bogarde. Scientists are conducting dubious psychological experiments with prolonged immersion in sensory deprivation tanks, during which rather than relaxation or cosmic unity, people are experiencing temporary madness and eventually find themselves in a highly suggestible state of mind where reimprinting is possible. The film, although well shot, seems a strange mix of pulpy and melodrama which didn't totally work for me, but that I still found pretty original and entertaining. The tank is seen as a scary potential weapon rather than a healing tool, but the brainwashing themes might appeal to the RAW-oriented audience.
Oz, you must be talking about A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry? I wasn't aware of this book, thank you for the recommendation, it looks fantastic.
As a final film note, the 2018 Frederick Wiseman documentary Monrovia, Indiana features a scene at the local Masonic Lodge. No high secret is revealed that I picked up on, and in fact it all looks pretty tame and boring. A fascinating 15 minutes nonetheless.
Spookah, yes, that's the Waite book. It is an encyclopdia, not a history per se. I looked at it today and it does contain a lot of interesting entries.
ReplyDeleteI haven't see Waking Life but it's now on my list to check out. I like Linklater as a Director.
Wanted to note that Eric Wagner's book "An Insider's Guide to Robert Anton Wilson" has a chapter, "Appendix Samekh Illuminatus!", which explains the kabbalistic structure of "Illuminatus!"
ReplyDelete"The Hidden Heritage" is maybe my favorite chapter in the book so far, with lots of Wilson wit and insight into many topics. One could do a lot of reading just following the suggestions in this chapter, which seems to have brought out a particularly strong effort from Oz.
Thank-you, Tom. The chapter suggestion toAn Insider's Guide to Robert Anton Wilson nicely supplements and complements the Cabala practice/research above. I highly recommend the book in general.
ReplyDeleteIt seems Jerry Cornelius is dead.
ReplyDeletehttps://zeroequalstwo.net/jerry-cornelius-has-passed-away/